World Jewish Congress assembly condemns BDS movement as a 'manifestation of anti-Semitism'

A special Plenary Assembly of the World Jewish Congress (WJC) in Buenos Aires, attended by more than 400 delegates and observers from 67 Jewish communities, on Wednesday voted unanimously to allow WJC President Ronald S. Lauder to stand for a third consecutive term as WJC president, as stipulated by the WJC’s constitution.

In a keynote address to the assembly, Lauder highlighted the challenges facing the Jewish people and the State of Israel today. It was the first time the WJC held a meeting of its highest decision-making body in Latin America.

Lauder declared that anti-Semitism and anti-Semites had to be confronted forcefully wherever and whenever they manifested themselves. “The Jewish people are not going to disappear. We are small in number – there a just 15 million of us around the world – but we are a brilliant and innovative people. It is the job of the World Jewish Congress to harness that brilliance."

Lauder also said the WJC would fight the anti-Israel BDS movement and accused the United Nations of failing to live up to its own ideals and charter and having become a “cesspool of anti-Semitism”.

He told the delegates: “We will answer the lies on the internet and in the media with the truth. Remember one important fact: We are not the Jews of the 1930s. We have influence; we have great power, we have tremendous resources, and we have creativity that is the envy of the world. I intend to use everything in our arsenal, and I will not be silent.

“We will not be silent. The world will hear our voice,” Lauder ended his speech, after which he received an enthusiastic standing ovation from the delegates.

The Plenary Assembly also adopted a resolution which “considers the Boycott, Divestment and Sanction (BDS) movement, and all other attempts to delegitimize the State of Israel, to be manifestations of anti-Semitic discrimination against the only truly democratic country in the Middle East, and damaging to any genuine efforts for peace in the region.”

Resolution condemns Israel boycott movement as 'manifestation of anti-Semitism'

The WJC considers “efforts to discriminate against and delegitimize the State of Israel on university campuses, including the boycott of Israeli scholars and academicians, to be especially pernicious,” and condemns “those who deliberately seek to prevent economic, academic, and cultural cooperation, and obstructing global and Israeli and Palestinian economic opportunities.

The text adopted by the delegates applauds countries and community leaders that “have taken concrete action to condemn BDS, or to acknowledge the discriminatory nature of BDS and other forms of unlawful activities against the State of Israel.”

The resolution also commends the WJC leadership for establishing a new department in the New York office to counter BDS and other forms of discrimination against the State of Israel, bringing together like-minded organizations and movements from around the world.

Add new comment

We welcome any comments you may have on this article. Comments are moderated and we reserve the right to edit or remove any which are derogatory or offensive. The WJC is not responsible for the content of any comments.


Ernest Posner

Thu, 17 Mar 2016

The speech is timely and necessary. Next there must be some action in the United Nations.
What a chore this will be!

Joshua Laskin

Thu, 17 Mar 2016

A boycott is by its very nature 'discriminatory', in that it discriminates in application, between institutions to boycott and those not to boycott. The 1933 Jewish boycott against Germany, 'discriminated' against Germany. Those boycotters weren't considering all the mistreatments of all peoples by all governments on Earth; nor were they judging that German Jews were the most oppressed, of all oppressed people on Earth. BDS 'discriminates' against Israel, in that it's specifically targeted at Israel, for its occupation policies. The assumption by those opposed to BDS, seems to be that if BDS-supporters are stopped from promoting BDS, they'll do nothing--which seems highly improbable. There could be unforeseen dangers, in blocking a movement of nonviolent resistance. A future alternative could appear, in response, which could easily be something much worse. In hindsight, BDS may be seen, in comparison, as a fairly harmless way that some folks were letting off some steam, without really posing very much of a threat to the existence of the Jewish state; and, the Anti-BDS movement may, in future, be seen as having been motivated primarily by fear of the loss of social status.


Subscribe to our newsletter

WJC in the media