Obama tries to assuage Jewish concerns over US Middle East policy

22 April 2010

President Barack Obama has tried to reassure Jews in the United States that his administration's commitment to Israel remained "unshakable" despite recent tensions between Jerusalem and Washington. In a letter written by Obama to Alan Solow, the chairman of the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, and quoted by the Israeli newspapers ‘Jerusalem Post’ and ‘Haaretz’, Obama highlights the "special relationship with Israel, and that will not change.”

He adds: "Our countries are bound together by shared values, deep and interwoven connections, and mutual interests. Many of the same forces that threaten Israel also threaten the United States and our efforts to secure peace and stability in the Middle East. Our alliance with Israel serves our national security interests.”
 
“As we continue to strive for lasting peace agreements between Israel, the Palestinians, and Israel’s neighbors, all sides should understand that our commitment to Israel’s security is unshakeable and that no wedge will be driven between us. We will have our differences, but when we do, we will work to resolve them as close allies,” the president writes.
 
He continues: “For over 60 years, American presidents have believed that pursuing peace between Arabs and Israelis is in the national security interests of the United States.” He also addressed the peace negotiations, asserting that he would not impose “peace from the outside; it must be negotiated directly by the leaders who are required to make the hard choices and compromises that take on history.”

Last week, World Jewish Congress President Ronald S. Lauder wrote an open letter to Obama in which he lamented the “the dramatic deterioration of diplomatic relations between the United States and Israel” in recent months. Obama’s letter to Solow was the first official reaction by the White House on criticism by Jewish organizations in America of the president’s handling of US-Israeli relations.

Meanwhile, Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu rejected the Obama administration's demands to freeze construction in the eastern part of Jerusalem. The Prime Minister's Bureau responded on Thursday to a ‘Wall Street Journal’ report that the Israeli government had delivered over the weekend its most substantive response yet to that US request. According to the report, Netanyahu did agree to a number of peace-building measures demanded by the Obama administration, including the release of some Palestinian prisoners jailed in Israel, an ease on Israel's blockade of the Gaza Strip and efforts toward improving Palestinian movement in the West Bank.

» Senior Obama administration official says time is not ripe for US peace plan

» Obama sends special message on Israel’s Independence Day

» Interview - Ronald S. Lauder: “Israel has been strongly neglected”

» WJC PRESIDENT URGES OBAMA TO CHANGE STANCE ON ISRAEL

» Israelis unfazed by diplomatic spat with US, poll finds

» Obama: No crisis between US and Israel; Iran “highest priority”

» US Congressmen rebuke Obama administration for stark criticism of Israel

» What do you think about the current state of US-Israel relations? Poll_tab

WJC and Supporting Israel

Comments

We welcome any comments you may have on this article.

  • Your email address will not be displayed on the website.
  • Comments will be reviewed before posted on the website.

Morris M. Solomon, about 1 year ago

I only have a very short comment. I would not change anything until Palestine announces to the world that israel has a right to exist.

sara, about 1 year ago

obama is pulling a jimmy carter act. now that many jews who supported him are disgusted with his dumping on israel, and he is losing votes, but most importantly for him, large donors, he tries to charm his way back. i hope jewish leaders don't fall for his dishonest words. his history defined by his early associations, and various appointments and coupled with his actions towards israel and its leaders, are the things which one should listen to--not empty words of an opportunist

Annette R. Smith, over 2 years ago

Like others, I have concerns about the situation vis a vis the relationship between the US and Israel. But to say that the US "demands" anything of Israel is to be untruthful in order to bias the situation in the direction the writer wants it to go.

Arturo Leal, over 2 years ago

As soon as We release some Palestinian prisoners jailed in Israel; We ease on Israel's blockade of the Gaza Strip and; We allow Palestinian movement in the West Bank;We Stop Building Apartments: The Palestians will demand more and, they will start something else to keep demanding more.

The Palestian's FINAL Objective is for US to Give them ALL of Israel...That's is UNACCEPTABLE. Therefore, We Should give them Nothing...They have Not Earn it...

There's No Peace through Compromise with the Palestians. Their Paradigm Behavior is like most of the Arab Nations: Anti-Jewish...

Lets Stop Pretending and Act with Our People in Mind.

Moshe Sheskin, over 2 years ago

Words are rather cheap. It isn't what you say, it's what you do that counts? I'm not assured by President Obama's reply.

If you are a facebook user you may choose to have the comment appear on your wall.

Comments are moderated and we reserve the right to edit or remove any which are derogatory or offensive.

The WJC is not responsible for the content of any comments.

Button_tweet Button_fb Button_youtube Button_rss

Get Involved

Opinion Poll

Do you think a political solution to the conflict between Israel and the Palestinians will be achieved in the coming years?