Once someone said that, sooner or later, the U.N would cast a majority vote to state that the world is square and that this resolution would be unassailable.
The U.N. is consistently turning the tables on reality. In fact, this organization and all its agencies and bodies, such as the Human Rights Council, have an automatic majority of Islamic countries and of so-called non aligned anti-American and anti-Israeli countries that vote any decision based on their interests. That is the interests of obsolete and new dictatorships without any concern for truth and with a perverse interpretation of human rights. And these rights are the more righteous and human the more they meet their agenda.
But now we are all in danger. Two days ago, the U.N. approved the report by judge Goldstone who provides his personal description of the war in Gaza in 575 pages. And even if we are used to the worst when it comes to Israel, this is a bitter pill that we will have to take wherever in the world there is a non conventional war; that is a war where there are not two armies fighting each other, but, on one side there is an army and, on the other, there are fanatic and terrorist militias who believe they have the right, indeed the duty, to use civilian populations to conduct their war. Let us imagine, for example, that, in its anti-Al Qaeda and anti-Taliban offensive – which is indispensable to prevent Islamic extremists from getting hold of (90) atomic bombs – the Pakistani army is governed by rules under which they must not face their enemies hidden in civilian facilities, houses, mosques and schools. Let us imagine that in Afghanistan, the USA, the UK, France and Italy are morally and criminally liable for setting up check points - possibly one close to the other – to surround an area to prevent terrorists full of explosives from leaving. Let us imagine that all this is considered as a clear violation of human rights, as a «voluntary» persecution of the civilian population; that this is prohibited under international law and therefore it is a crime to be judged first by the Security Council and then by the International Court in the Hague. In fact, this is the procedure envisaged in the Goldstone report, which ultimately will put Israeli soldiers on the defendants’ bench.
Let us suppose that even these decisions are based on the favorite lies spread by the organizations professionally committed to destroying Israel and making it the number one enemy. These are the witnesses chosen by Goldstone to draft his report. And so the realities depicted in this text are simply lies: for example, the witnesses always deny the presence of Hamas fighters in certain areas to explain that Israel has fired against civilians. But it is the Hamas website itself that boasts about the nice fight conducted by its militias. The report denies the use of ambulances to transport weapons, the use of the U.N. offices and private homes as trenches, as reported by many witnesses. It denies that the whole Hamas leadership was based under a hospital. It ignores the use of mosques like stores for weapons... and, above all, it does not acknowledge that the war was a reaction to years of terrorist persecutions and to tens of thousand of missiles. And this should be of concern for the free world.
It is well known that Israel is the most tasteful meal for the U.N.
One third of the U.N. security council resolutions have been passed to condemn it, while infamous serial violators of human rights such as Yemen, Libya, Iran, Cuba, Sudan, almost all Arab countries, China, all the Countries that create armies with child soldiers (300 thousand), those who throw their enemies from rooftops, like Hamas, go around undisturbed.
Finally: no one should please say that it wants peace. In order to arrive at an agreement to give up land, Israel has to take enormous risks for its people. As shown by the withdrawal from Gaza and Lebanon, Israel remains at the mercy of the enemy’s missiles. If Israel is denied the right to defend itself, how can it become even smaller in favor of its enemy?
