Initiative to ban circumcision in San Francisco condemned by Jewish groups
19 November 2010
Jewish organizations have condemned a proposal to outlaw ritual circumcision of minors in San Francisco. The Anti-Defamation League, the SFJewish Community Relations Council, the Board of Rabbis of Northern California and the American Jewish Committee together issued a statement expressing “great concern” about the proposed initiative by a San Francisco resident, which would – if approved in a referendum next year – make the practice of ritual circumcision (Brith Milah), on anyone under the age 18 a misdemeanor carrying a US$ 1,000 fine.
“For thousands of years, Jews around the world have engaged in this important religious ritual, which is of fundamental importance in the Jewish tradition. The organized Jewish community is deeply troubled by this initiative, which would interfere with the rights of parents to make religious decisions for their own families, the statement said.”
San Francisco resident Lloyd Schofield is spearheading the effort to collect enough signatures to get the measure on the ballot next year. At least 7,100 signatures are needed to qualify. Schofield wants to ban the practice of male circumcision, including for Jewish religious purposes. Female circumcision is already illegal. Schofield argues that male circumcision on boys under the age of consent should be illegal, too. “People can practice whatever religion they want, but your religious practice ends with someone else’s body,” he recently told the TV network CBS. “His body doesn’t belong to his culture, his government, his religion or even his parents. It’s his decision.”
While the proposed measure has drawn international media attention, the Jewish agencies who condemned the effort said they believed any such measure would be defeated at the ballot box. “San Francisco has a tradition of embracing the diversity and respecting the religious customs of its citizens,” the joint statement said. “We trust that the voters of San Francisco will see this proposed initiative as an affront to that tradition and to their freedom.”
Comments
We welcome any comments you may have on this article.
There is no comment for the moment.
If you are a facebook user you may choose to have the comment appear on your wall.
Comments are moderated and we reserve the right to edit or remove any which are derogatory or offensive.
The WJC is not responsible for the content of any comments.
Get Involved
