Spanish neo-Nazi given 33-month prison sentence for incitement against Jews
09 March 2010
A court in the Spanish city of Barcelona has sentenced the neo-Nazi Pedro Varela to two years and nine months in jail and fined him US$ 4,000 for calling for a genocide against Jews and Blacks, and for selling hate literature in his ‘Europa’ bookstore in Barcelona. Varela received a prison sentence of 15 months for propagating genocidal ideas and another 18 months for working to overthrow fundamental freedoms enshrined in the Spanish Constitution.
Prosecutors had asked for a four-year prison term for Varela (pictured above with the British Holocaust denier David Irving). His defense lawyers had argued that Varela belonged to no political party and that there were no banned books in Spain.
The bookstore owner has previously been sentenced to a prison term on similar charges, but avoided going to jail because he had no a criminal record. Varela was the first person to be punished under a 1996 law that made propagating genocide a crime in Spain.
» Should the denial of the Holocaust be punishable under the law? 
Comments
We welcome any comments you may have on this article.
First of all, David Irving is NOT a holocaust denier. He disputes the total number killed but still numbers the dead in the millions.
Second, I rather doubt Varela called for genocide for blacks and Jews. This sounds like a gross exaggeration re-phrase by the prosecution. Notice the article did not provide any quotes from the material or additional references, which I find rather odd.
This is just another example of the repeal of fundamental rights in Europe for politically unpopular people who have the gall to speak out.
If you are a facebook user you may choose to have the comment appear on your wall.
Comments are moderated and we reserve the right to edit or remove any which are derogatory or offensive.
The WJC is not responsible for the content of any comments.
Get Involved
Nilsson, over 2 years ago
As 'Saf' said, there are lacunae in this report. The definitions of 'denial'. 'hatred', 'incitement to genocide' etc are too woolly to satisfy.
Many with minds of their own will wonder why of all the atrocities-- true or alleged by interested parties-- which have defiled the name of humanity in wartime, this is the only one which regularly requires dissentients to be fired, fined, jailed and ostracised from polite, free-speech-loving liberal societies.
Such punitive actions only inflame curiosity and skepticism. They are hollow triumphs for the upholders of the authorized version of the Shoah-- which has been subjected to considerable revision by respectable historians over the years in any case.
The witch-hunters shoud beware. The less reasonable the campaign, the harsher the eventual backlash may be.