10 February 2010
President Barack Obama has pledged that the United States and its allies would soon deliver a "significant regime of sanctions" against Iran for its nuclear program. At an ad hoc press briefing at the White House on Tuesday, Obama said a push for international sanctions against Iran was moving along fairly quickly and should be completed in the next few weeks. He stated that despite Tehran's denials it was clear to him that Iran was pursuing a path towards "nuclear weaponization" and “significant action” was necessary as a consequence. Obama said the international community was unified over what he called Iran's "misbehavior".
The US president’s bold remarks came after Iranian media reported that Tehran had begun the process of enriching uranium to 20-percent grade. Obama said he was pleased at Russia's quick disapproval of Iran's latest move, but added that it was still unclear how China – one of the five countries on the UN Security Council with veto powers – would respond to his initiative.
In London, British Foreign Secretary David Miliband said his Chinese counterpart had recently told him that Beijing was determined to stop Iran getting nuclear weapons. "It is very, very important that we therefore maintain maximum unity in developing the tactics to deliver on that goal," Miliband said.
Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told European diplomats that "Iran is racing forward to produce nuclear weapons. This means not moderate sanctions, or watered-down sanctions. This means crippling sanctions, and these sanctions must be applied right now."
Nikolai Patrushev, secretary of Russia's Presidential Security Council: "The actions [Iran] is taking, including when it began enriching low-enriched uranium to 20 per cent, raise doubts in other countries, and those doubts are quite valid." He added: "Political-diplomatic methods are important for a resolution, but there is a limit to everything."
Meanwhile, the Brazilian government cautioned against new Iran sanctions. "We do not want Iran to have nuclear arms, let there be no doubt about that. They, like other countries, have the right to a peaceful [nuclear] program," Foreign Minister Celso Amorim told reporters in the capital Brasilia. "We want to reach certainty [on the nature of Iran’s nuclear program] through dialogue and peaceful means," he said. Brazil has lobbied for a permanent seat on the Security Council and hosted Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in November 2009.
We welcome any comments you may have on this article.
Comments are moderated and we reserve the right to edit or remove any which are derogatory or offensive.
The WJC is not responsible for the content of any comments.
Israel were attacked from the Lebanon and rednspoed, they didn't invade. And Hizbollah used civilian locations to launch rockets from hence the bombing. Both pretty undisputed points of record I think. And as for Osirak are you seriously lamenting that action by Israel? Even although Iraqi exiles have provided proof the intention was nuclear arms you think Israel was wrong to bomb that plant? Do you really believe Israel is a threat to regional stability on the same scale as Iran Bob?And yes, it's pretty much as straightforward as our bas***ds' and I don't like it either it's ugly and depressing. But until I can articlate a credible, thought through sequence of alternatives for the international community to adopt I have to accept it. Monboit offers no such alternative he just takes pops at the west the left's very own heffer and just as contemptible.
Subscribe to our newsletter.